Acta Psychologica Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (2): 122-140.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2022.00122
• Reports of Empirical Studies • Previous Articles Next Articles
JIANG Yuan-Ping1, JIANG Cheng-Ming2, HU Tian-Yi1, SUN Hong-Yue1()
Received:
2021-03-22
Published:
2022-02-25
Online:
2021-12-24
Contact:
SUN Hong-Yue
E-mail:sunhy@shnu.edu.cn;sunhy1215@126.com
Supported by:
JIANG Yuan-Ping, JIANG Cheng-Ming, HU Tian-Yi, SUN Hong-Yue. (2022). Effects of emotion on intertemporal decision-making: Explanation from the single dimension priority model. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 54(2), 122-140.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://journal.psych.ac.cn/acps/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2022.00122
Deferred Amount | Delay time | Emotional group | M | SD | N |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
100 yuan | 10 days | Positive group | 0.068 | 0.083 | 37 |
Negative group | 0.096 | 0.163 | 36 | ||
Neutral group | 0.072 | 0.082 | 37 | ||
30 days | Positive group | 0.032 | 0.050 | 37 | |
Negative group | 0.045 | 0.061 | 36 | ||
Neutral group | 0.042 | 0.061 | 37 | ||
90 days | Positive group | 0.014 | 0.018 | 37 | |
Negative group | 0.020 | 0.027 | 36 | ||
Neutral group | 0.014 | 0.018 | 37 | ||
180 days | Positive group | 0.008 | 0.009 | 37 | |
Negative group | 0.013 | 0.015 | 36 | ||
Neutral group | 0.010 | 0.012 | 37 | ||
360 days | Positive group | 0.005 | 0.007 | 37 | |
Negative group | 0.010 | 0.009 | 36 | ||
Neutral group | 0.006 | 0.007 | 37 | ||
1000 yuan | 10 days | Positive group | 0.064 | 0.148 | 37 |
Negative group | 0.343 | 0.333 | 36 | ||
Neutral group | 0.075 | 0.085 | 37 | ||
30 days | Positive group | 0.024 | 0.053 | 37 | |
Negative group | 0.088 | 0.112 | 36 | ||
Neutral group | 0.030 | 0.037 | 37 | ||
90 days | Positive group | 0.010 | 0.019 | 37 | |
Negative group | 0.032 | 0.037 | 36 | ||
Neutral group | 0.010 | 0.013 | 37 | ||
180 days | Positive group | 0.008 | 0.014 | 37 | |
Negative group | 0.016 | 0.018 | 36 | ||
Neutral group | 0.007 | 0.009 | 37 | ||
360 days | Positive group | 0.004 | 0.006 | 37 | |
Negative group | 0.008 | 0.008 | 36 | ||
Neutral group | 0.004 | 0.006 | 37 |
Table 1 Descriptive statistics of time discount rate under different emotional groups, delay amount and delay time (N = 110)
Deferred Amount | Delay time | Emotional group | M | SD | N |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
100 yuan | 10 days | Positive group | 0.068 | 0.083 | 37 |
Negative group | 0.096 | 0.163 | 36 | ||
Neutral group | 0.072 | 0.082 | 37 | ||
30 days | Positive group | 0.032 | 0.050 | 37 | |
Negative group | 0.045 | 0.061 | 36 | ||
Neutral group | 0.042 | 0.061 | 37 | ||
90 days | Positive group | 0.014 | 0.018 | 37 | |
Negative group | 0.020 | 0.027 | 36 | ||
Neutral group | 0.014 | 0.018 | 37 | ||
180 days | Positive group | 0.008 | 0.009 | 37 | |
Negative group | 0.013 | 0.015 | 36 | ||
Neutral group | 0.010 | 0.012 | 37 | ||
360 days | Positive group | 0.005 | 0.007 | 37 | |
Negative group | 0.010 | 0.009 | 36 | ||
Neutral group | 0.006 | 0.007 | 37 | ||
1000 yuan | 10 days | Positive group | 0.064 | 0.148 | 37 |
Negative group | 0.343 | 0.333 | 36 | ||
Neutral group | 0.075 | 0.085 | 37 | ||
30 days | Positive group | 0.024 | 0.053 | 37 | |
Negative group | 0.088 | 0.112 | 36 | ||
Neutral group | 0.030 | 0.037 | 37 | ||
90 days | Positive group | 0.010 | 0.019 | 37 | |
Negative group | 0.032 | 0.037 | 36 | ||
Neutral group | 0.010 | 0.013 | 37 | ||
180 days | Positive group | 0.008 | 0.014 | 37 | |
Negative group | 0.016 | 0.018 | 36 | ||
Neutral group | 0.007 | 0.009 | 37 | ||
360 days | Positive group | 0.004 | 0.006 | 37 | |
Negative group | 0.008 | 0.008 | 36 | ||
Neutral group | 0.004 | 0.006 | 37 |
Type | Title | |
---|---|---|
Question 1: Instant options with small amount | A gains 60 yuan now | B gains 100 yuan 30 days later |
Question 2: Non-instant options with small amount | A gains 400 yuan 8 weeks later | B gains 600 yuan 16 weeks later |
Question 3: Non-instant options with large amount | A gains 6,600 yuan 2 years later | B gains 10,000 yuan 4 years later |
Question 4: Instant options with large amount | A gains 640 yuan now | B gains 1000 yuan 6 months later |
Table 2 Intertemporal choice topic
Type | Title | |
---|---|---|
Question 1: Instant options with small amount | A gains 60 yuan now | B gains 100 yuan 30 days later |
Question 2: Non-instant options with small amount | A gains 400 yuan 8 weeks later | B gains 600 yuan 16 weeks later |
Question 3: Non-instant options with large amount | A gains 6,600 yuan 2 years later | B gains 10,000 yuan 4 years later |
Question 4: Instant options with large amount | A gains 640 yuan now | B gains 1000 yuan 6 months later |
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of comparison of inter-dimensional difference (visual analog scale) (taking 400 yuan obtained after 8 weeks and 600 yuan obtained after 16 weeks as examples).
Figure 3. Intertemporal preference scores and inter-dimensional differences comparison scores under positive and negative emotional states in four decision-making problems. Note. The number in the figure is M (SD), and the error line is the standard deviation, the same below.
Figure 4. Mediation model: a is the effect of X on M, b is the effect of M on Y, c is the total effect of X on Y, and c' is the direct effect of X on Y. Question 1: a1 = -0.40*, SE = 0.19; b1 = 0.90***, SE = 0.04; c1 = -0.37, SE = 0.19; c'1 = -0.01, SE = 0.09. Question 2: a2 = -0.46*, SE = 0.19; b2 = 0.88***, SE = 0.05; c2 = -0.49*, SE = 0.19; c'2 = -0.08, SE = 0.09. Question 3: a3 = -0.69***, SE = 0.19; b3 = 0.88***, SE = 0.04; c3 = -0.77***, SE = 0.18; c'3 = -0.16, SE = 0.09. Question 4: a4 = -0.67***, SE = 0.19; b4 = 0.92***, SE = 0.05; c4 = -0.53**, SE = 0.19; c'4 = 0.09, SE = 0.09 (Note: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, the same below).
Predictive variable | Result Variable: Intertemporal Preference | Result Variables: Comparison of Inter-dimensional differences | Result Variable: Intertemporal Preference | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In addition, it is necessary for us to | SE | t | In addition, it is necessary for us to | SE | t | In addition, it is necessary for us to | SE | t | ||
Question 1 | Gender | -0.07 | 0.21 | -0.72 | -0.11 | 0.20 | -0.56 | -0.05 | 0.12 | -0.42 |
Age | 0.22 | 0.07 | 2.22* | 0.10 | 0.07 | 1.51 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.63 | |
Emotional Valence | -0.13 | 0.20 | -1. 33 | -0.91 | 0.28 | -3.21** | -0.12 | 0.12 | -1. 07 | |
Time Priming | -2. 12 | 0.58 | -3.66*** | |||||||
Emotional Valence × Time priming | 1.26 | 0.37 | 3.42*** | |||||||
Comparison of Inter-Dimensional Differences | 0.81 | 0.06 | 13.83*** | |||||||
R2 | 0.08 | 0.18 | 0.68 | |||||||
F | 2.81* | 4.26** | 53.86*** | |||||||
Question 2 | Gender | -0.07 | 0.21 | -0.67 | -0.20 | 0.20 | -1.01 | 0.01 | 0.12 | 0.07 |
Age | 0.11 | 0.07 | 1.07 | -0.09 | 0.07 | -1.33 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 1.31 | |
Emotional valence | -0.22 | 0.20 | -2.25* | -0.88 | 0.28 | -3.17** | -0.12 | 0.12 | -1. 05 | |
Time Priming | -1. 94 | 0.57 | -3.39** | |||||||
Emotional Valence × Time priming | 0.80 | 0.36 | 2.20* | |||||||
Comparison of Inter-Dimensional Differences | 0.80 | 0.06 | 13.87*** | |||||||
R2 | 0.07 | 0.20 | 0.68 | |||||||
F | 2.59 | 5.10*** | 53.76*** | |||||||
Question 3 | Gender | 0.01 | 0.20 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.19 | 0.27 | -0.03 | 0.12 | -0.22 |
Age | 0.25 | 0.06 | 2.67** | 0.09 | 0.06 | 1.48 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.84 | |
Emotional valence | -0.32 | 0.18 | -3.53** | -1. 13 | 0.27 | -4.27*** | -0.23 | 0.12 | -1. 89 | |
Time Priming | -1. 93 | 0.54 | -3.56*** | |||||||
Emotional Valence × Time priming | 0.99 | 0.35 | 2.88** | |||||||
Comparison of Inter-Dimensional Differences | 0.76 | 0.06 | 12.30*** | |||||||
R2 | 0.20 | 0.28 | 0.68 | |||||||
F | 8.36*** | 7.60*** | 53.41*** | |||||||
Question 4 | Gender | -0.01 | 0.20 | -0.07 | -0.29 | 0.19 | -1.58 | 0.21 | 0.13 | 1.64 |
Age | 0.23 | 0.06 | 2.36* | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.56 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 1.56 | |
Emotional valence | -0.28 | 0.19 | -2.99** | -1. 33 | 0.26 | -5.03*** | -0.16 | 0.12 | -1.31 | |
Time Priming | -2. 48 | 0.54 | -4.58*** | |||||||
Emotional Valence × Time priming | 1.37 | 0.34 | 3.97*** | |||||||
Comparison of Inter-dimensional differences | 0.76 | 0.06 | 12.02*** | |||||||
R2 | 0.16 | 0.28 | 0.65 | |||||||
F | 6.16** | 7.86*** | 47.32*** |
Table 3 Mediating effect test of emotional valence on intertemporal choice preference
Predictive variable | Result Variable: Intertemporal Preference | Result Variables: Comparison of Inter-dimensional differences | Result Variable: Intertemporal Preference | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In addition, it is necessary for us to | SE | t | In addition, it is necessary for us to | SE | t | In addition, it is necessary for us to | SE | t | ||
Question 1 | Gender | -0.07 | 0.21 | -0.72 | -0.11 | 0.20 | -0.56 | -0.05 | 0.12 | -0.42 |
Age | 0.22 | 0.07 | 2.22* | 0.10 | 0.07 | 1.51 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.63 | |
Emotional Valence | -0.13 | 0.20 | -1. 33 | -0.91 | 0.28 | -3.21** | -0.12 | 0.12 | -1. 07 | |
Time Priming | -2. 12 | 0.58 | -3.66*** | |||||||
Emotional Valence × Time priming | 1.26 | 0.37 | 3.42*** | |||||||
Comparison of Inter-Dimensional Differences | 0.81 | 0.06 | 13.83*** | |||||||
R2 | 0.08 | 0.18 | 0.68 | |||||||
F | 2.81* | 4.26** | 53.86*** | |||||||
Question 2 | Gender | -0.07 | 0.21 | -0.67 | -0.20 | 0.20 | -1.01 | 0.01 | 0.12 | 0.07 |
Age | 0.11 | 0.07 | 1.07 | -0.09 | 0.07 | -1.33 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 1.31 | |
Emotional valence | -0.22 | 0.20 | -2.25* | -0.88 | 0.28 | -3.17** | -0.12 | 0.12 | -1. 05 | |
Time Priming | -1. 94 | 0.57 | -3.39** | |||||||
Emotional Valence × Time priming | 0.80 | 0.36 | 2.20* | |||||||
Comparison of Inter-Dimensional Differences | 0.80 | 0.06 | 13.87*** | |||||||
R2 | 0.07 | 0.20 | 0.68 | |||||||
F | 2.59 | 5.10*** | 53.76*** | |||||||
Question 3 | Gender | 0.01 | 0.20 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.19 | 0.27 | -0.03 | 0.12 | -0.22 |
Age | 0.25 | 0.06 | 2.67** | 0.09 | 0.06 | 1.48 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.84 | |
Emotional valence | -0.32 | 0.18 | -3.53** | -1. 13 | 0.27 | -4.27*** | -0.23 | 0.12 | -1. 89 | |
Time Priming | -1. 93 | 0.54 | -3.56*** | |||||||
Emotional Valence × Time priming | 0.99 | 0.35 | 2.88** | |||||||
Comparison of Inter-Dimensional Differences | 0.76 | 0.06 | 12.30*** | |||||||
R2 | 0.20 | 0.28 | 0.68 | |||||||
F | 8.36*** | 7.60*** | 53.41*** | |||||||
Question 4 | Gender | -0.01 | 0.20 | -0.07 | -0.29 | 0.19 | -1.58 | 0.21 | 0.13 | 1.64 |
Age | 0.23 | 0.06 | 2.36* | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.56 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 1.56 | |
Emotional valence | -0.28 | 0.19 | -2.99** | -1. 33 | 0.26 | -5.03*** | -0.16 | 0.12 | -1.31 | |
Time Priming | -2. 48 | 0.54 | -4.58*** | |||||||
Emotional Valence × Time priming | 1.37 | 0.34 | 3.97*** | |||||||
Comparison of Inter-dimensional differences | 0.76 | 0.06 | 12.02*** | |||||||
R2 | 0.16 | 0.28 | 0.65 | |||||||
F | 6.16** | 7.86*** | 47.32*** |
Figure 7. Intertemporal decision preference scores of participants in different emotional groups under the conditions of money priming and non-priming.
Figure 8. Comparison scores of inter-dimensional differences of participants in different emotional groups under the conditions of money priming and non-priming
Predictive variable | Result Variable: Intertemporal Preference | Result Variables: Comparison of Inter-dimensional differences | Result Variable: Intertemporal Preference | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In addition, it is necessary for us to | SE | t | In addition, it is necessary for us to | SE | t | In addition, it is necessary for us to | SE | t | ||
Question 1 | Gender | -0.10 | 0.23 | -0.93 | -0.36 | 0.22 | -1.68 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.49 |
Age | -0.06 | 0.07 | -0.59 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 1.13 | -0.05 | 0.04 | -1.28 | |
Emotional Valence | -0.10 | 0.21 | -0.98 | -0.58 | 0.29 | -2.02* | 0.01 | 0.12 | 0.04 | |
Money Priming | -0.21 | 0.59 | -0.35 | |||||||
Emotional Valence × Money priming | 0.57 | 0.38 | 1.51 | |||||||
Comparison of Inter-Dimensional Differences | 0.83 | 0.06 | 14.35*** | |||||||
R2 | 0.03 | 0.16 | 0.68 | |||||||
F | 1.03 | 3.70** | 53.86*** | |||||||
Question 2 | Gender | 0.07 | 0.23 | 0.67 | 0.20 | 0.23 | 0.88 | -0.05 | 0.13 | -0.38 |
Age | -0.03 | 0.07 | -0.23 | -0.04 | 0.07 | -0.58 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.73 | |
Emotional valence | -0.18 | 0.21 | -1.70 | -0.79 | 0.30 | -2.63* | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.39 | |
Money Priming | -0.68 | 0.62 | -1.10 | |||||||
Emotional Valence × Money priming | 0.56 | 0.40 | 1.42 | |||||||
Comparison of Inter-Dimensional Differences | 0.83 | 0.06 | 14.54*** | |||||||
R2 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.69 | |||||||
F | 0.99 | 1.65 | 55.14*** | |||||||
Question 3 | Gender | 0.07 | 0.23 | 0.62 | -0.02 | 0.22 | -0.12 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.85 |
Age | 0.22 | 0.07 | 2.08* | 0.18 | 0.07 | 2.66 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.60 | |
Emotional valence | -0.05 | 0.20 | -0.48 | -0.69 | 0.28 | -2.45* | -0.07 | 0.09 | -0.82 | |
Money Priming | -1.31 | 0.59 | -2.23* | |||||||
Emotional Valence × Money priming | 1.18 | 0.37 | 3.17** | |||||||
Comparison of Inter-Dimensional Differences | 0.89 | 0.04 | 20.36*** | |||||||
R2 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 0.82 | |||||||
F | 2.26 | 4.25** | 112.22*** | |||||||
Question 4 | Gender | 0.09 | 0.23 | 0.87 | 0.16 | 0.23 | 0.69 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.06 |
Age | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.81 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 1.19 | -0.02 | 0.03 | -0.63 | |
Emotional valence | -0.17 | 0.20 | -1.61 | -0.64 | 0.30 | -2.13* | -0.12 | 0.10 | -1.18 | |
Money Priming | -1.06 | 0.62 | -1.71 | |||||||
Emotional Valence × Money priming | 0.71 | 0.39 | 1.81 | |||||||
Comparison of Inter-Dimensional Differences | 0.87 | 0.05 | 17.67*** | |||||||
R2 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.77 | |||||||
F | 1.58 | 1.73 | 82.92*** |
Table 4 Mediating effect test of emotional valence on intertemporal choice preference
Predictive variable | Result Variable: Intertemporal Preference | Result Variables: Comparison of Inter-dimensional differences | Result Variable: Intertemporal Preference | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In addition, it is necessary for us to | SE | t | In addition, it is necessary for us to | SE | t | In addition, it is necessary for us to | SE | t | ||
Question 1 | Gender | -0.10 | 0.23 | -0.93 | -0.36 | 0.22 | -1.68 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.49 |
Age | -0.06 | 0.07 | -0.59 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 1.13 | -0.05 | 0.04 | -1.28 | |
Emotional Valence | -0.10 | 0.21 | -0.98 | -0.58 | 0.29 | -2.02* | 0.01 | 0.12 | 0.04 | |
Money Priming | -0.21 | 0.59 | -0.35 | |||||||
Emotional Valence × Money priming | 0.57 | 0.38 | 1.51 | |||||||
Comparison of Inter-Dimensional Differences | 0.83 | 0.06 | 14.35*** | |||||||
R2 | 0.03 | 0.16 | 0.68 | |||||||
F | 1.03 | 3.70** | 53.86*** | |||||||
Question 2 | Gender | 0.07 | 0.23 | 0.67 | 0.20 | 0.23 | 0.88 | -0.05 | 0.13 | -0.38 |
Age | -0.03 | 0.07 | -0.23 | -0.04 | 0.07 | -0.58 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.73 | |
Emotional valence | -0.18 | 0.21 | -1.70 | -0.79 | 0.30 | -2.63* | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.39 | |
Money Priming | -0.68 | 0.62 | -1.10 | |||||||
Emotional Valence × Money priming | 0.56 | 0.40 | 1.42 | |||||||
Comparison of Inter-Dimensional Differences | 0.83 | 0.06 | 14.54*** | |||||||
R2 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.69 | |||||||
F | 0.99 | 1.65 | 55.14*** | |||||||
Question 3 | Gender | 0.07 | 0.23 | 0.62 | -0.02 | 0.22 | -0.12 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.85 |
Age | 0.22 | 0.07 | 2.08* | 0.18 | 0.07 | 2.66 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.60 | |
Emotional valence | -0.05 | 0.20 | -0.48 | -0.69 | 0.28 | -2.45* | -0.07 | 0.09 | -0.82 | |
Money Priming | -1.31 | 0.59 | -2.23* | |||||||
Emotional Valence × Money priming | 1.18 | 0.37 | 3.17** | |||||||
Comparison of Inter-Dimensional Differences | 0.89 | 0.04 | 20.36*** | |||||||
R2 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 0.82 | |||||||
F | 2.26 | 4.25** | 112.22*** | |||||||
Question 4 | Gender | 0.09 | 0.23 | 0.87 | 0.16 | 0.23 | 0.69 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.06 |
Age | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.81 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 1.19 | -0.02 | 0.03 | -0.63 | |
Emotional valence | -0.17 | 0.20 | -1.61 | -0.64 | 0.30 | -2.13* | -0.12 | 0.10 | -1.18 | |
Money Priming | -1.06 | 0.62 | -1.71 | |||||||
Emotional Valence × Money priming | 0.71 | 0.39 | 1.81 | |||||||
Comparison of Inter-Dimensional Differences | 0.87 | 0.05 | 17.67*** | |||||||
R2 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.77 | |||||||
F | 1.58 | 1.73 | 82.92*** |
[1] |
Aaker, J. L., Rudd, M., & Mogilner, C. (2011). If money does not make you happy, consider time. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(2), 126-130.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2011.01.004 URL |
[2] |
Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1974). Interference in memory for multiple contexts. Memory & Cognition, 2(3), 509-514.
doi: 10.3758/BF03196913 URL |
[3] |
Arieli, A., Ben-Ami, Y., & Rubinstein, A. (2011). Tracking decision makers under uncertainty. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 3(4), 68-76.
doi: 10.1257/mic.3.4.68 URL |
[4] | Clore, G. L., Gasper, K., & Garvin, E. (2001). Affect as information. Handbook of Affect and Social Cognition, 121-144. |
[5] |
DeSteno, D., Li, Y., Dickens, L., & Lerner, J. S. (2014). Gratitude: A tool for reducing economic impatience. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1262-1267.
doi: 10.1177/0956797614529979 pmid: 24760144 |
[6] |
Duan, J. Y., Wu, S. J., & Sun, L. Y. (2017). Do the powerful discount the future less? The effects of power on temporal discounting. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1007.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01007 URL |
[7] |
Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49(8), 709-724.
pmid: 8092614 |
[8] |
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191.
doi: 10.3758/BF03193146 URL |
[9] |
Forgas, J. P., & East, R. (2008). On being happy and gullible: Mood effects on skepticism and the detection of deception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1362-1367.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.010 URL |
[10] |
Forgas, J. P., & Moylan, S. (1987). After the movies: Transient mood and social judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13(4), 467-477.
doi: 10.1177/0146167287134004 URL |
[11] |
Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O'donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 351-401.
doi: 10.1257/jel.40.2.351 URL |
[12] |
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218-226.
pmid: 11315248 |
[13] |
Fujita, K., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Levin-Sagi, M. (2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), 351-367.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.351 URL |
[14] |
Gable, P., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2010). The motivational dimensional model of affect: Implications for breadth of attention, memory, and cognitive categorisation. Cognition and Emotion, 24(2), 322-337.
doi: 10.1080/02699930903378305 URL |
[15] | Guan, S., Cheng, L., Fan, Y., & Li, X. (2015). Myopic decisions under negative emotions correlate with altered time perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 468. |
[16] | Hardisty, D. J., Fox-Glassman, K., Krantz, D., & Weber, E. U. (2011). How to measure discount rates? An experimental comparison of three methods. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 8(3), 236-249. |
[17] | Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: Methodology in the social sciences. Guilford Press, Kindle Edition. |
[18] |
Huang, M. X., Lei, L., & Zhu, H. W. (2016). Money or romance: How should companies lead consumers in we-media sharing? Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48(2), 211-220.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00211 URL |
[19] |
Ifcher, J., & Zarghamee, H. (2011). Happiness and time preference: The effect of positive affect in a random- assignment experiment. American Economic Review, 101(7), 3109-3129.
doi: 10.1257/aer.101.7.3109 URL |
[20] | Jiang, D. (2015). The strategies in intertemporal decision-making. (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Zhejiang University, China. |
[21] | Jiang, C. M., & Li, S. (2015). Mediation analysis and the application of bootstrap in mediation analysis. Psychological Exploration, 35(5), 458-463. |
[22] |
Jiang, C. M., Liu, H. Z., Cai, X. H., & Li, S. (2016). A process test of priority models of intertemporal choice. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48(1), 59-72.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00059 URL |
[23] |
Kasser, T., & Sheldon, K. M. (2009). Time affluence as a path toward personal happiness and ethical business practice: Empirical evidence from four studies. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(2), 243-255.
doi: 10.1007/s10551-008-9696-1 URL |
[24] |
Keren, G., & Roelofsma, P. (1995). Immediacy and certainty in intertemporal choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(3), 287-297.
doi: 10.1006/obhd.1995.1080 URL |
[25] |
Kirby, K. N., Petry, N. M., & Bickel, W. K. (1999). Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(1), 78-87.
doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.128.1.78 URL |
[26] |
Laibson, D. (1997). Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112 (2), 443-478.
doi: 10.1162/003355397555253 URL |
[27] |
Lee, L., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2009). In search of homo economicus: Cognitive noise and the role of emotion in preference consistency. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 173-187.
doi: 10.1086/597160 URL |
[28] |
Lee, L., Lee, M. P., Bertini, M., Zauberman, G., & Ariely, D. (2015). Money, time, and the stability of consumer preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(2), 184-199.
doi: 10.1509/jmr.10.0386 URL |
[29] |
Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 146-159.
pmid: 11474720 |
[30] |
Lerner, J. S., Li, Y., Valdesolo, P., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 799-823.
doi: 10.1146/psych.2015.66.issue-1 URL |
[31] |
Lerner, J. S., Li, Y., & Weber, E. U. (2013). The financial costs of sadness. Psychological Science, 24(1), 72-79.
doi: 10.1177/0956797612450302 URL |
[32] |
Li, A. M., Peng, Y., Li, B., & Ling, W. Q. (2014). The effects of money priming on pro-social behavior and its decision mechanism. Advances in Psychological Science, 22(5), 845-856.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00845 URL |
[33] |
Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 5-18.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.5 URL |
[34] |
Liu, H. Z., Jiang, C. M., Rao, L. L., & Li, S. (2015). Discounting or priority: Which rule dominates the intertemporal choice process? Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47(4), 522-532.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.00522 URL |
[35] |
Liu, L., Feng, T. Y., Chen, J., & Li, H. (2013). The value of emotion: How does episodic prospection modulate delay discounting? PloS One, 8(11), e81717.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081717 URL |
[36] | Liu, L., Zhao, W. H., & Feng, T. Y. (2012). Cognitive and neural mechanisms of intertemporal choice. Journal of Psychological Science, 35(1), 56-61. |
[37] |
Liu, W., & Aaker, J. (2008). The happiness of giving: The time-ask effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 543-557.
doi: 10.1086/588699 URL |
[38] |
Li, X. M., & Xie, J. (2012). The influence mechanism of incidental emotions on choice deferral. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44(12), 1641-1650.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2012.01641 URL |
[39] |
Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (1992). Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and an interpretation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 573-597.
doi: 10.2307/2118482 URL |
[40] |
Luo, S., Ainslie, G., & Monterosso, J. (2014). The behavioral and neural effect of emotional primes on intertemporal decisions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(3), 283-291.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nss132 URL |
[41] |
Mandel, N., & Johnson, E. J. (2002). When web pages influence choice: Effects of visual primes on experts and novices. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(2), 235-245.
doi: 10.1086/341573 URL |
[42] |
Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106(1), 3-19.
pmid: 10197361 |
[43] |
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102(2), 246-268.
pmid: 7740090 |
[44] |
Mogilner, C. (2010). The pursuit of happiness: Time, money, and social connection. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1348-1354.
doi: 10.1177/0956797610380696 pmid: 20732902 |
[45] |
Mogilner, C., & Aaker, J. (2009). “The time vs. money effect”: Shifting product attitudes and decisions through personal connection. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 277-291.
doi: 10.1086/597161 URL |
[46] |
Muraven, M., Baumeister, R. F., & Tice, D. M. (1999). Longitudinal improvement of self-regulation through practice: Building self-control strength through repeated exercise. The Journal of Social Psychology, 139(4), 446-457.
doi: 10.1080/00224549909598404 URL |
[47] |
Pham, M. T., Cohen, J. B., Pracejus, J. W., & Hughes, G. D. (2001). Affect monitoring and the primacy of feelings in judgment. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(2), 167-188.
doi: 10.1086/322896 URL |
[48] |
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.
doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 URL |
[49] |
Pyone, J. S., & Isen, A. M. (2011). Positive affect, intertemporal choice, and levels of thinking: Increasing consumers' willingness to wait. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 532-543.
doi: 10.1509/jmkr.48.3.532 URL |
[50] |
Quoidbach, J., Dunn, E. W., Petrides, K. V., & Mikolajczak, M. (2010). Money giveth, money taketh away: The dual effect of wealth on happiness. Psychological Science, 21(6), 759-763.
doi: 10.1177/0956797610371963 pmid: 20483819 |
[51] |
Sagristano, M. D., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2002). Time-dependent gambling: Odds now, money later. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131(3), 364-376.
doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.131.3.364 URL |
[52] |
Samuelson, P. A. (1937). A note on measurement of utility. The Review of Economic Studies, 4(2), 155-161.
doi: 10.2307/2967612 URL |
[53] |
Scholten, M., & Read, D. (2010). The psychology of intertemporal tradeoffs. Psychological Review, 117(3), 925-944.
doi: 10.1037/a0019619 pmid: 20658858 |
[54] |
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 513-523.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513 URL |
[55] | She, S. X., Chen, Y., Chen, J., & Yang, F. (2017). The effect of fear on intertemporal choice: An experiment based on recalling emotion. Psychological Exploration, 37(06), 543-548. |
[56] | She, S. X., Zheng, X. W., Zhou, J., & Yang, S. S. (2016). Does fear increase impatience in intertemporal choice? Evidence from an experiment. Psychological Exploration, 36(01), 25-30. |
[57] |
Song, Y. X., Cheng, Y. H., XieZhou, X. T., Gong, N. Y., & Liu, L. (2021). The influence of anger on delay discounting: The mediating role of certainty and control. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 53(05), 456-468.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00456 URL |
[58] |
Su, L., & Gao, L. L. (2014). Strategy compatibility: The time versus money effect on product evaluation strategies. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(4), 549-556.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2014.04.006 URL |
[59] |
Tice, D. M., Bratslavsky, E., & Baumeister, R. F. (2001). Emotional distress regulation takes precedence over impulse control: If you feel bad, do it!. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 53-67.
pmid: 11195891 |
[60] |
Tong, L. Q., Zheng, Y. H., & Zhao, P. (2013). Is money really the root of all evil? The impact of priming money on consumer choice. Marketing Letters, 24(2), 119-129.
doi: 10.1007/s11002-013-9224-7 URL |
[61] |
Trautmann, S. T., & van de Kuilen, G. (2012). Prospect theory or construal level theory?: Diminishing sensitivity vs. psychological distance in risky decisions. Acta psychologica, 139(1), 254-260.
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.08.006 pmid: 22011526 |
[62] |
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403-421.
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403 URL |
[63] |
Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R. (2006). The psychological consequences of money. Science, 314(5802), 1154-1156.
doi: 10.1126/science.1132491 URL |
[64] | Wang, P., & Liu, Y. F. (2009). The effect of mood on intertemporal choice. Psychological Ence, 32(6), 1318-1320. |
[65] |
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.
pmid: 3397865 |
[66] |
Wen, Z. L., & Ye, B. J. (2014). Different methods for testing moderated mediation models: Competitors or backups? Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46(5), 714-726.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.00714 URL |
[67] |
Winterich, K. P., Han, S., & Lerner, J. S. (2010). Now that I’m sad, it’s hard to be mad: The role of cognitive appraisals in emotional blunting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(11), 1467-1483.
doi: 10.1177/0146167210384710 pmid: 20876386 |
[68] | Yang, X. W., & He, G. B. (2015). Happiness makes people farsighted in intertemporal choice. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 21(3), 242-248. |
[69] | Ye, Q. L. (2016). The Effect of power and hopefulness on intertemporal choice (Unpublished master’s thesis). Hunan Normal University, China. |
[70] | Zeelenberg, M., Nelissen, R. M. A., Breugelmans, S. M., & Pieters, R. (2008). On emotion specificity in decision making: Why feeling is for doing. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(1), 18-27. |
[71] | Zhang, W. D., Diao, J., & Schick, C. J. (2004). The cross-cultural measurement of positive and negative affect examining the dimensionality of PANAS. Journal of Psychological Science, (1), 77-79. |
[72] |
Zhou, R. R., & Pham, M. T. (2004). Promotion and prevention across mental accounts: When financial products dictate consumers& investment goals. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 125-135.
doi: 10.1086/383429 URL |
[73] | Zou, J. L., Zhang, X. C., Zhang, H., Yu, L., & Zhou, R. L. (2011). Beyond dichotomy of valence and arousal: Review of the motivational dimensional model of affect. Advances in Psychological Science, 19(9), 1339-1346. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||